Hearsay
and Exceptions
a)
What is Hearsay?
Hearsay evidence is normally excluded from
trial because it is deemed untrustworthy. “Hearsay” is a statement other than one
made by the witness testifying at the trial, offered in evidence to prove that
the matter asserted in the statement is true. An example of hearsay is a
witness testifying that he heard another person saying something about the
facts of the case. The reason that hearsay is untrustworthy is because the
opposing side has no way of testing the credibility of the out-of-court
statement or the person who supposedly made the statement. Thus, for example,
the following questions would be objectionable as “hearsay” if you are trying
to prove that the color of the door was red:
“Mr. Edwards what
color did Bob say the door was?”
This is hearsay. Mr. Edwards is using Bob’s
statement for him to prove the color of the door. Instead, Bob or someone who
saw the door needs to be called to testify as to the color of the door.
b)
Reasons for
Prohibiting Hearsay
Our legal system is designed to promote the
discovery of truth in a fair way. One way to seeks to accomplish this goal is
by ensuring that the evidence presented in court is “reliable”; that is, we can
be fairly sure that the evidence is true. Hearsay evidence is said to be
“unreliable” for four reasons:
i)
The
hearsay statement might be distorted or misinterpreted by the witness relating
it in court.
ii)
The
hearsay statement is not made in court and is not made under oath.
iii)
The
hearsay statement is not made in court, and the person who made it cannot be
observed by the judge or jury (this is important because the judge or jury
should be allowed to observe a witness’ behavior and evaluate his/ her
credibility).
iv)
The
hearsay statement is not made in court and the person who made it cannot be
challenged by cross-examination.
c)
When Can Hearsay
Evidence Be Admitted?
Although hearsay is generally not admissible,
there are certain out-of-court statements that are treated as not being
hearsay, and there are out-of-court statements that are allowed into evidence
as exceptions to the rule prohibiting hearsay.
Statements that are not hearsay are prior
statements made by the witness himself and admissions made by a party opponent.
i)
Exceptions
Hearsay is not admissible, except as provided
by these rules. For purposes of this mock trial, the following exceptions to the
hearsay rule will be allowed; even though the declarant is available as a
witness.
(1) Spontaneous Statement
A statement describing or explaining an event
o condition made while the declarant perceived the event or condition, or
immediately thereafter, except when such statement is made under circumstances
that indicate its lack of trustworthiness.
(2) Excited Utterance
A statement or excited utterance relating to
a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of
excitement caused by the event or condition.
(3) Medical Statements
Statements made for the purpose of medical
diagnosis or treatment by a person seeking the diagnosis, or made by an
individual who has knowledge of the facts and is legally responsible for the
person who is unable to communicate the facts, which statements describe
medical history, past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or the
inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof, in as
far as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.
(4) Recorded Recollection
A memorandum or record concerning a matter
about which a witness once had knowledge but now has insufficient recollection
to enable the witness to testify fully and accurately, shown to have been by
the witness when the matter was fresh in his memory and to reflect that
knowledge correctly. A party may read into evidence a memorandum or record when
it is admitted, but no such memorandum or record is admissible as an exhibit
unless offered by an adverse party.
(5) Records of a Regularly Conducted Activity
(a)
A
memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events,
conditions, opinion, or diagnosis, made at or near the time by, or from
information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if kept in the course of a
regularly conducted business activity and if it was the regular practice of
that business activity to make such memorandum, report, record, or data
compilation, all as shown by testimony of the custodian or other qualified
witness, unless the source of information or other circumstances show lack of
trustworthiness. The term “business” as used in this paragraph includes a
business, institution, association, profession, occupation, and calling for
every kind, whether or not conducted for profit.
(b)
No
evidence in the form of an opinion or diagnosis is admissible under paragraph
(a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would otherwise be admissible if the
person whose opinion is recorded were to testify to the opinion directly.
(6) Learned Treatises
To the extent called to attention of an
expert witness upon cross examination or relied upon by the expert witness in
direct examination, statements contained in public treaties, periodicals or
pamphlets on a subject of history, medicine, or other science or art, established
as a reliable authority by the testimony or admission of the witness, or by
other expert testimony, or by judicial notice.
(7) Then Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition
(a) A statement of the declarant’s state of mind,
emotion, or physical sensation, including a statement of intent, plan, motive,
design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health, when such evidence is offered
to:
(i)
Prove
the declarant’s state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation at the time or at
any other time when such state is an issue in the action.
(ii)
Prove
or explain acts of subsequent conduct of the declarant.
(b)
However, this subsection does not make admissible:
(i)
An
after-the-fact statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or
believed, unless such a statement relates to the execution, revocation,
identification, or terms of the declarant’s will.
(ii) A statement made under circumstances that indicate its lack of trustworthiness.